Tecno Pova Neo 3 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova Neo 3 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 6.82 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in April, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Lighter design: 201g vs 206g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.1
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8 % | 89.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 170.67 mm (6.72 in) | 163.72 mm (6.45 in) |
| Width | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) | 75.88 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) | 8.09 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP65 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- White - Black - Gold - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 430 | 2195 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1459 | 7107 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 19064 |
| CPU | 83506 | 477787 |
| GPU | 50281 | 866462 |
| Memory | 56435 | 364040 |
| UX | 64772 | 333216 |
| NanoReview Score | 254994 | 2041505 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | OriginOS 5 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 70 min) | Yes (50% in 13 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | 0:33 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 16 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.0 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B5/B8/B6/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2023 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 120 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0