Tecno Pova Neo 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Pova Neo 3 Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 6.82 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, Manufactured in January, 2019with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 660. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 7
- Higher pixel density: 409ppi
- Lighter design: 186g vs 201g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.3 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8 % | 81.4 % |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.3 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 2336 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 43.2 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1639:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 170.67 mm (6.72 in) | 159.2 mm (6.27 in) |
| Width | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) | 75.2 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.84 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 680 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 512 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 217.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 430 | 518 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1459 | 1562 |
| CPU | 83506 | 90916 |
| GPU | 50281 | 38054 |
| Memory | 56435 | 55264 |
| UX | 64772 | 67441 |
| NanoReview Score | 254994 | 251675 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 37.6 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 96 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 373 |
| Writing score | n/a | 6439 |
| Web score | n/a | 5258 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5275 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5354 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6255 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 9 (Upgradeable to Android 10) |
| OS Size | n/a | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 70 min) | Yes Quick Charge 4 (60% in 50 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:30 h | 1:50 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 07:45 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 11:59 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:43 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 110 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 16 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Depth: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV13855 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B850/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500) |
| LTE category | 7 | 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | n/a |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2023 yr | January, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | January, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova Neo 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0