Home Phone comparison Tecno Spark 10C and Google Pixel 10 Pro - Which is better?

Tecno Spark 10C vs Google Pixel 10 Pro

49 out 100
Tecno Spark 10C
VS
85 out 100
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Tecno Spark 10C
Google Pixel 10 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 10C Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T606, vs Google Pixel 10 Pro, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetGoogle Tensor G5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 10C
  • Larger display: 6.6in
  • Lighter design: 202g vs 207g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4870mAh
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 10 Pro
  • Higher pixel density: 495ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 8/128 GB		 - 16/128 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Tecno Spark 10C and Google Pixel 10 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Tecno Spark 10C
vs
Google Pixel 10 Pro

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD OLED
Size 6.6 in 6.3 in
Resolution 720x1612 pixels 1280x2856 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 267 ppi 495 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 400 nits 3300 nits
HDR support No Yes, HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio 85.1 % 87.1 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 163.84 mm (6.45 in) 152.8 mm (6.02 in)
Width 75.49 mm (2.97 in) 72 mm (2.83 in)
Thickness 8.5 mm (0.33 in) 8.5 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 202 g (7.13 oz) 207 g (7.3 oz)
Water resistance No IP68
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Blue
- Green		 - White
- Black
- Gray
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Tecno Spark 10C
85.1 %
Google Pixel 10 Pro
87.1 %

Performance

Testing Tecno Spark 10C and Google Pixel 10 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T606 Google Tensor G5
Max Frequency 1600 MHz 3780 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 5 + 2)
Architecture - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75)		 - 2/2.25 (Cortex-A520)
- 5/3.05 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.78 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor No Yes
Graphics Mali-G57 MP1 PowerVR DXT-48-1536
GPU Cores 32 n/a
GPU Frequency 650 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS 83.2 GFLOPS 1536 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Tecno Spark 10C
370
Google Pixel 10 Pro
2475
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Tecno Spark 10C
1316
Google Pixel 10 Pro
6981
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)3702475
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)13166981
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Tecno Spark 10C]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Tecno Spark 10C
246517
Google Pixel 10 Pro
1547010
CPU76536499563
GPU23834553871
Memory81835224903
UX64312268673
NanoReview Score2465171547010
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Tecno Spark 10C
420
Google Pixel 10 Pro
n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Tecno Spark 10C]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Tecno Spark 10C
7034
Google Pixel 10 Pro
n/a
Writing score8693n/a
Web score7476n/a
Video editing4415n/a
Data manipulation5302n/a
NanoReview Score7034n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 1600 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 64 GB
- 128 GB		128 GB
Storage TypeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.0
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 12 Android 16
UI Skin HiOS 8.6 Stock Android

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 4870 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 30 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (12 W)
Reverse Charging No Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 40 min) Yes (55% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:50 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 16 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8160x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (720p) 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 123 °
Lenses count Standard: 16 MP
Depth: 0.08 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 48 MP
Ultra-wide: 48 MP
Features Bokeh effect - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix16 MP50 MP
Aperturen/af/1.7
Focal lengthn/a25 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung GN1
Sensor sizen/a1/2
Pixel sizen/a1.2 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Telephoto
Matrixn/a48 MP
Aperturen/af/2.8
Focal lengthn/a113 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung S5KGM5
Sensor sizen/a1/2
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
Stabilizationn/aOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a48 MP
Aperturen/af/1.7
Sensorn/aSamsung S5KGM5
Sensor sizen/a1/2
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 42 MP
Photo resolution n/a 3648x2736 pixels
Aperture f/2 f/2.2
Focal length n/a 17 mm
Sensor CMOS n/a
Sensor size n/a 1/2.51
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*21
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM Standbyn/a
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM/EDGE Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
3G Bandsn/aUMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71)
LTE category4n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Class Budget Flagship
Announced March, 2023 yr August, 2025 yr
Release Date March, 2023 yr August, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 115 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 999
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 18 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 10 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below