Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Honor 90 Lite
62
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 30 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100, vs Honor 90 Lite, Manufactured in June, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4500mAh
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Honor 90 Lite
- Lighter design: 179g vs 185g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1080x2388 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 19.9:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1700 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 89.6 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) | 7.48 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | No |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 733 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2028 | 1927 |
| CPU | 129291 | 135029 |
| GPU | 70881 | 62888 |
| Memory | 105409 | 103707 |
| UX | 117287 | 101222 |
| NanoReview Score | 422868 | 402846 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14.5 | MagicOS 7.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 38 min) | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:12 h | 1:52 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 100 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 11584x8688 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth |
Standard: 100 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 100 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 220 | 300 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 35 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
