Tecno Spark 30 Pro vs Tecno Pova Neo 3
62
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 30 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100, vs Tecno Pova Neo 3, Manufactured in July, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 185g vs 201g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova Neo 3
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 21:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1700 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7 % | 84.8 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) | 170.67 mm (6.72 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | No |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 733 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2028 | 1459 |
| CPU | 129291 | 83506 |
| GPU | 70881 | 50281 |
| Memory | 105409 | 56435 |
| UX | 117287 | 64772 |
| NanoReview Score | 422868 | 254994 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14.5 | HIOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 38 min) | Yes (50% in 70 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:12 h | 2:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth |
Standard: 16 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | July, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 220 | 150 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
