Tecno Spark 30 vs Infinix Note 60
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 30 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91, vs Infinix Note 60, Manufactured in February, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30
- Lighter design: 193g vs 199g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 60
- Higher pixel density: 429ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 168 mm (6.61 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Metal |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Gray - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 420 | 1051 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1442 | 3181 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3061 |
| CPU | 85618 | 231456 |
| GPU | 41911 | 156231 |
| Memory | 68761 | 199856 |
| UX | 78270 | 167001 |
| NanoReview Score | 274560 | 754544 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14.5 | XOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | n/a |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes (50% in 26 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 0:54 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.6 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX682 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 130 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
Note
Tecno Spark 30:
In a standard plastic case, the smartphone has a thickness of 7.7, and with an eco-leather cover, it is 7.9 thick.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Note 60 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0