Tecno Spark 30 vs Oppo Realme C30
56
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 30 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91, vs Oppo Realme C30, Manufactured in July, 2022 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 396ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C30
- Lighter design: 182g vs 193g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.5 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 800 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5 % | 82.3 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 168 mm (6.61 in) | 164.1 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G91 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 614 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 420 | 512 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1442 | 1556 |
| CPU | 85618 | 75961 |
| GPU | 41911 | 31322 |
| Memory | 68761 | 59626 |
| UX | 78270 | 61702 |
| NanoReview Score | 274560 | 228611 |
| Writing score | n/a | 7826 |
| Web score | n/a | 7204 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4917 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5723 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 7603 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14.5 | Realme UI Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 2:55 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth |
Standard: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX682 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA Bands 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B/B1/B3/B5/B8) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | July, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | July, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 130 | 85 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 10 W |
Note
Tecno Spark 30:
In a standard plastic case, the smartphone has a thickness of 7.7, and with an eco-leather cover, it is 7.9 thick.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
