Tecno Spark 30C vs Xiaomi Redmi 8
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 30C Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81, vs Xiaomi Redmi 8, Manufactured in October, 2019 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30C
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 187g vs 188g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5 vs 4.2
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 8
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.22 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1520 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2 % | 81.8 % |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 95.7 % |
| Response time | n/a | 55.2 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 2308:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.9 mm (6.45 in) | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 in) | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | Yes |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 536 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 505 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 450 MHz |
| FLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 449 | 476 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1380 | 1521 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 483 | n/a |
| CPU | 81702 | 55305 |
| GPU | 35061 | 15306 |
| Memory | 67099 | 50584 |
| UX | 61283 | 29875 |
| NanoReview Score | 245145 | 151070 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) |
| OS Size | n/a | 15 GB |
| UI Skin | HiOS 13 | MIUI 12.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 40 min) | Yes Quick Charge 3.0 (50% in 85 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:50 h | 3:20 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 08:09 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 10:10 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:49 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 110 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 113 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 12 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX363 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3648x2190 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4(1700/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B2100)) |
| LTE category | 7 | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | October, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | October, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 150 | 140 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30C the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0