Tecno Spark 40C vs Honor 600 Lite 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 40C Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81, vs Honor 600 Lite 5G, Manufactured in March, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 40C
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Honor 600 Lite 5G
- Higher pixel density: 434ppi
- Lighter design: 180g vs 190g
- Higher battery capacity: 6520mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1200x2600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 434 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 90.2 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 157.43 mm (6.2 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 75.35 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 7.34 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP66 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81 | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 Elite |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G610 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS | 256 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 444 | 989 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1372 | 3024 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2253 |
| CPU | 76856 | 322567 |
| GPU | 35386 | 104245 |
| Memory | 64168 | 168869 |
| UX | 69127 | 178689 |
| NanoReview Score | 245537 | 774370 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15.1 | MagicOS 10 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6520 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 (0.6) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3456x4608 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 100 | 300 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 600 Lite 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0