Tecno Spark 40C vs Vivo V70 FE
55
out 100
VS
71
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 40C Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81, vs Vivo V70 FE, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 40C
- Lighter design: 190g vs 202g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Vivo V70 FE
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 449ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 77 mm (3.03 in) | 76.2 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 7.59 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Silver - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G81 | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 820 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 444 | 1025 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1372 | 2882 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2523 |
| CPU | 76856 | 337926 |
| GPU | 35386 | 123256 |
| Memory | 64168 | 200218 |
| UX | 69127 | 242810 |
| NanoReview Score | 245537 | 904210 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 15.1 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:10 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 200 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 (0.32) |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 100 | 350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V70 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
