Tecno Spark 8C vs Realme C85 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 8C Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Realme C85 4G, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 8C
- Higher pixel density: 267ppi
- Lighter design: 193g vs 215g
Reasons to choose Realme C85 4G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 720x1570 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 87.7 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.57 mm (6.48 in) | 166.2 mm (6.54 in) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.95 mm (0.35 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX2 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 499 | 480 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1540 | 1514 |
| CPU | 78764 | 144708 |
| GPU | 22204 | 20888 |
| Memory | 59509 | 128828 |
| UX | 64021 | 106958 |
| NanoReview Score | 224498 | 401382 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 396 | n/a |
| Writing score | 7592 | n/a |
| Web score | 6908 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4874 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6030 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7467 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | n/a |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HiOS 7.6 | Realme UI 6.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:50 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.96 (0.34) |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B3)/B40)/B1800(/B2300() | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2022 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2022 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 110 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Realme C85 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0