Tecno Spark 8C vs ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
40
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark 8C Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T9100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 8C
- Lighter design: 193g vs 209g
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 386ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1 % | 0 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.57 mm (6.48 in) | 167.5 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.95 mm (0.35 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX2 | No |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Gray - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Unisoc T9100 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2.1 (Cortex-A55) - 3/2.3 (Cortex-A76) - 1/2.7 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 780 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 199.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 499 | 890 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1540 | 2441 |
| CPU | 78764 | 187773 |
| GPU | 22204 | 93539 |
| Memory | 59509 | 131216 |
| UX | 64021 | 124668 |
| NanoReview Score | 224498 | 537196 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 396 | n/a |
| Writing score | 7592 | n/a |
| Web score | 6908 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4874 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6030 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7467 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HiOS 7.6 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:50 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | n/a | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B3)/B40)/B1800(/B2300() | n/a |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2022 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2022 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 110 | 230 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
