Tecno Spark Go 1 vs Honor 400 Lite
45
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 1 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615, vs Honor 400 Lite, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 1
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Lighter design: 161g vs 185g
- Higher battery capacity: 5230mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20.1:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | No | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 161 mm (6.34 in) |
| Width | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 161 g (5.68 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T615 | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 144 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 956 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1454 | 2303 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 596 | 143 |
| CPU | 88108 | 161440 |
| GPU | 30185 | 78966 |
| Memory | 73422 | 116384 |
| UX | 66427 | 140445 |
| NanoReview Score | 258142 | 497235 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5230 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 299 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
