Tecno Spark Go 1 vs Samsung Galaxy A20
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 1 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615, vs Samsung Galaxy A20, Manufactured in March, 2019 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 1
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A20
- Higher pixel density: 268ppi
- Lighter design: 169g vs 185g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
3/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 268 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 84.9 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 158.4 mm (6.24 in) |
| Width | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T615 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.35 (Cortex-A53) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS | 49.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 482 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1454 | 1526 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 596 | n/a |
| CPU | 88108 | 61354 |
| GPU | 30185 | 17164 |
| Memory | 73422 | 48475 |
| UX | 66427 | 38199 |
| NanoReview Score | 258142 | 165192 |
| Stability | n/a | 85 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 1 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 324 |
| Writing score | n/a | 4872 |
| Web score | n/a | 4726 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3603 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 4769 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 5004 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | One UI 3.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (25% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | 2:00 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 28 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 150 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0