Tecno Spark Go 1 vs Tecno Spark 30
45
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 1 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615, vs Tecno Spark 30, Manufactured in October, 2024with chipsetMediaTek Helio G91. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 1
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 185g vs 193g
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 396ppi
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 86.5 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 168 mm (6.61 in) |
| Width | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T615 | MediaTek Helio G91 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 420 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1454 | 1442 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 596 | n/a |
| CPU | 88108 | 85618 |
| GPU | 30185 | 41911 |
| Memory | 73422 | 68761 |
| UX | 66427 | 78270 |
| NanoReview Score | 258142 | 274560 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | HIOS 14.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | 1:50 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 64 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX682 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.7 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | September, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 130 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | Yes 18 W |
Note
Tecno Spark 30:
In a standard plastic case, the smartphone has a thickness of 7.7, and with an eco-leather cover, it is 7.9 thick.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 30 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
