Tecno Spark Go 1 vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 1 Manufactured in August, 2024, with display 6.67 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615, vs Xiaomi Redmi 7A, Manufactured in June, 2019with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 439. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 1
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 7A
- Higher pixel density: 295ppi
- Lighter design: 165g vs 185g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 2/16 GB - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.67 in | 5.45 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1440 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 18:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 530 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.2 % | 74.4 % |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 94.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 384 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 27 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 888:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 146.3 mm (5.76 in) |
| Width | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) | 70.4 mm (2.77 in) |
| Thickness | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) | 9.5 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T615 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.45 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon 536 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 505 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 450 MHz |
| FLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 441 | 477 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1454 | 1521 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 596 | n/a |
| CPU | 88108 | 37665 |
| GPU | 30185 | 14471 |
| Memory | 73422 | 26778 |
| UX | 66427 | 39104 |
| NanoReview Score | 258142 | 118018 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 16 GB - 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) |
| OS Size | n/a | 6.4 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 14 | MIUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 15 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (49% in 40 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:55 h | 2:35 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 06:26 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 09:44 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:10 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 90 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 12 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX486 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.9 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | n/a | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B1900/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | n/a | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | May, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2024 yr | June, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | 85 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass |
| Charger Included | Yes 15 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0