Tecno Spark Go 2023 vs Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2023 Manufactured in January, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetMediatek Helio A22, vs Samsung Galaxy A07 4G, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediatek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2023
- Higher pixel density: 267ppi
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Lighter design: 184g vs 199g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | n/a |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 85.1 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.86 mm (6.45 in) | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 75.51 mm (2.97 in) | 77.4 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.6 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX2 | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- White - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio A22 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 4 (4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | 4/2 (Cortex-A53) | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | NeuroPilot | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 16 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 20.8 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 474 | 535 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1524 | 1770 |
| CPU | 33298 | 127969 |
| GPU | 10557 | 66079 |
| Memory | 43956 | 111206 |
| UX | 35958 | 107944 |
| NanoReview Score | 123769 | 413198 |
| Writing score | 5414 | n/a |
| Web score | 4698 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3975 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 3109 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 4817 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 12 | One UI 7.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (44% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:15 h | 1:25 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1(2100), B5(850), B8(900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28) |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 120 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 5 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A07 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0