Tecno Spark Go 2023 vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2023 Manufactured in January, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetMediatek Helio A22, vs Tecno Camon 50 4G, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2023
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 4G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 429ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 172g vs 199g
- Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.86 mm (6.45 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 75.51 mm (2.97 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX2 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio A22 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 4 (4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | 4/2 (Cortex-A53) | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | NeuroPilot | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 16 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 20.8 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 474 | 746 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1524 | 2020 |
| CPU | 33298 | 131686 |
| GPU | 10557 | 72057 |
| Memory | 43956 | 110256 |
| UX | 35958 | 119058 |
| NanoReview Score | 123769 | 433057 |
| Writing score | 5414 | n/a |
| Web score | 4698 | n/a |
| Video editing | 3975 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 3109 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 4817 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 12 | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (44% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:15 h | 1:18 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 14 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2592x1944 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 4 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2023 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 90 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 5 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0