Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Huawei Honor 8A
43
out 100
VS
31
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2024 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Huawei Honor 8A, Manufactured in March, 2019 with chipsetMediaTek Helio P35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2024
- Larger display: 6.6in
- Higher refresh rate: 90Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5 vs 4.2
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 8A
- Higher pixel density: 282ppi
- Lighter design: 150g vs 190g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.09 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 720x1560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 282 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 79.2 % |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 98.1 % |
| Response time | n/a | 36.4 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1111:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.69 mm (6.44 in) | 156.2 mm (6.15 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 73.5 mm (2.89 in) |
| Thickness | 8.55 mm (0.34 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 150 g (5.29 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Helio P35 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 386 | 478 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1386 | 1521 |
| CPU | 82356 | 57867 |
| GPU | 22960 | 14142 |
| Memory | 83576 | 34794 |
| UX | 58448 | 26218 |
| NanoReview Score | 247340 | 133021 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 9.0 |
| OS Size | n/a | 15 GB |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | EMUI 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 3020 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | No |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 3:00 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 07:15 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 11:07 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:24 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 95 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | BSI CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 4.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B700/B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | 7 | 6 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | January, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | March, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | 220 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 2024 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
