Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Oppo Realme C75
43
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2024 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Oppo Realme C75, Manufactured in December, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G92 Max. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2024
- Lighter design: 190g vs 196g
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C75
- Larger display: 6.72in
- Higher pixel density: 392ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.72 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | 690 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 86.3 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.69 mm (6.44 in) | 165.69 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 76.22 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.55 mm (0.34 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Gold |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Helio G92 Max |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek APU |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 386 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1386 | 1356 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1075 |
| CPU | 82356 | 58520 |
| GPU | 22960 | 40838 |
| Memory | 83576 | 59672 |
| UX | 58448 | 63939 |
| NanoReview Score | 247340 | 222969 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | Realme UI 5.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (40% in 30 min) |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.88 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 7 | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | November, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | December, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | 180 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Realme C75 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
