Tecno Spark Go 2024 vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Tecno Spark Go 2024 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Vivo V60 Lite 5G, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2024
- Lighter design: 190g vs 194g
Reasons to choose Vivo V60 Lite 5G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 450 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 88.6 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.69 mm (6.44 in) | 163.77 mm (6.45 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 76.28 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.55 mm (0.34 in) | 7.59 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP65 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/3 (Cortex-A715) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek APU 657 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G610 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 386 | 1023 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1386 | 2817 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2525 |
| CPU | 82356 | 339607 |
| GPU | 22960 | 126506 |
| Memory | 83576 | 203622 |
| UX | 58448 | 238509 |
| NanoReview Score | 247340 | 908244 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | HIOS 13 | Funtouch OS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 21 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:52 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V60 Lite 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1