Vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F4
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO 12 Pro Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco F4, Manufactured in June, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 870. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 518ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F4
- Lighter design: 195g vs 205g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 518 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.4 % | 86.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 97.3 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 443 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.63 mm (6.48 in) | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 75.95 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.58 mm (0.34 in) | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Red |
- Black - Silver - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/3.2 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 1029.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2280 | 1285 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7034 | 3280 |
| CPU | 476415 | 230042 |
| GPU | 912996 | 286377 |
| Memory | 402578 | 132678 |
| UX | 340905 | 194488 |
| NanoReview Score | 2132894 | 843585 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 35.6 °C |
| Stability | 83 % | 90 % |
| Graphics Test | 97 fps | 25 fps |
| Graphics Score | 16344 | 4334 |
| Writing score | 19927 | n/a |
| Web score | 10134 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6427 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 12291 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 13833 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 16 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | n/a | 24 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:39 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 07:39 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 12:20 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:57 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 88 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50H | OmniVision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.45 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3P9 | Sony IMX596 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8/B6/B19 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | June, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | June, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 810 | 400 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO 12 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0