Vivo IQOO Neo 10 vs Samsung Galaxy M32

85 out 100

VS

45 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Samsung Galaxy M32, Manufactured in June, 2021 with chipsetMediatek Helio G80. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Vivo IQOO Neo 10

Larger display: 6.78in
Higher pixel density: 453ppi
Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
Higher battery capacity: 6100mAh vs 5000mAh
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Infrared port
Includes charger

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy M32

Lighter design: 180g vs 199g

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

- 4/64 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 and Samsung Galaxy M32

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

93

Samsung Galaxy M32

64

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

74

Samsung Galaxy M32

37

Performance

App & system performance

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

85

Samsung Galaxy M32

24

Games

3D gaming performance

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

93

Samsung Galaxy M32

18

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

97

Samsung Galaxy M32

67

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

80

Samsung Galaxy M32

59

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

85

Samsung Galaxy M32

45

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	AMOLED	Super AMOLED
Size	6.78 in	6.4 in
Resolution	1260x2800 pixels	1080x2400 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
Pixel density	453 ppi	411 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes (1-120 Hz)	No
Max brightness	1800 nits	450 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	No
Touch Sampling Rate	300 Hz	n/a
Screen-to-body ratio	90.4 %	83.9 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming	Always-On Display

Peak brightness (auto)

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

n/a

Samsung Galaxy M32

714 nits

sRGB gamut	n/a	99.1 %
PWM (Flicker)	n/a	362 Hz
Response time	n/a	9 ms
Contrast	n/a	∞ Infinite

Sources: NotebookCheck [Samsung Galaxy M32]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	162.92 mm (6.41 in)	159.3 mm (6.27 in)
Width	75.4 mm (2.97 in)	74 mm (2.91 in)
Thickness	7.99 mm (0.31 in)	8.4 mm (0.33 in)
Weight	199 g (7.02 oz)	180 g (6.35 oz)
Water resistance	IP54	No
Cooling system	Vapor chamber	n/a
Back panel	Glass	Plastic
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Colors	- White - Black - Orange	- Black - Blue
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes In-Button

Screen-to-body ratio

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

90.4 %

Samsung Galaxy M32

83.9 %

Performance

Testing Vivo IQOO Neo 10 and Samsung Galaxy M32 In benchmarks

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3	Mediatek Helio G80
Max Frequency	3300 MHz	2000 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)	- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75)
Process	TSMC	TSMC
Transistor Size	4 nm	12 nm
Neural Processor	Hexagon	Yes
Graphics	Adreno 750	Mali-G52 MP2
GPU Cores	1536	48
GPU Frequency	1000 MHz	950 MHz
FLOPS	2774 GFLOPS	91.2 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

2212

Samsung Galaxy M32

513

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

6767

Samsung Galaxy M32

1557

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	2212	513
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	6767	1557
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	17148	n/a

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo IQOO Neo 10]

AnTuTu 10

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

2093618

Samsung Galaxy M32

249988

CPU	458825	83929
GPU	903263	37651
Memory	394291	60141
UX	337239	68267
NanoReview Score	2093618	249988

3DMark Wild Life

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

n/a

Samsung Galaxy M32

674

Max Surface Temp.	n/a	45.4 °C
Stability	n/a	97 %
Graphics Test	n/a	4 fps
Graphics Score	n/a	674

Sources: 3DMark [Samsung Galaxy M32]

PCMark 3.0

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

n/a

Samsung Galaxy M32

6400

Writing score	n/a	6954
Web score	n/a	5106
Video editing	n/a	5074
Data manipulation	n/a	5759
NanoReview Score	n/a	6400

Memory

RAM Size	- 12 GB - 16 GB	- 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency	4800 MHz	1866 MHz
Channels	4	2

Storage Capacity	- 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB	- 64 GB - 128 GB
Storage Type	n/a	eMMC 5.1
Memory Card	n/a	MicroSD

Software

OS	Android 15	Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13)
OS Size	n/a	25 GB
UI Skin	OriginOS 5	One UI 5.1

Battery

Volume	6100 mAh	5000 mAh
Max Charging Power	120 W	25 W
Battery Type	Silicon Carbon	Li-ion
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	No
Reverse Charging	Yes	No
Fast Charging	Yes (50% in 15 min)	Yes (50% in 50 min)
Full Charge Time	0:30 h	2:25 h

Battery Life

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

n/a

Samsung Galaxy M32

22:05

Web Browsing	n/a	09:17 h
Video Playback	n/a	13:12 h
Games	n/a	05:22 h
Standby Mode	n/a	103 h

Main camera

Matrix	50 MP	64 MP
Photo resolution	8192x6144 pixels	9216x6912 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Optical	Digital
8K Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	No
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	No
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (1080p)	120 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens	119 °	123 °
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP	Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	50 MP	64 MP
Aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Focal length	n/a	26 mm
Sensor	Sony IMX921	n/a
Sensor size	1/1.56	1/1.97
Pixel size	1 μm	0.7 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Digital

Matrix	8 MP	8 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	n/a	13 mm
Sensor	Omnivision OV08D10	n/a
Sensor size	1/4	1/4.0
Pixel size	1.12 μm	1.12 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	16 MP	20 MP
Photo resolution	n/a	5380x3620 pixels
Aperture	f/2.5	f/2.2
Sensor	Samsung S5K3P9	CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.1	n/a
Pixel size	1 μm	n/a
Autofocus	No	No
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot
Bluetooth version	5.4	5
Bluetooth features	LE	PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	No	n/a
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo
NFC*	Yes	Varies by region
Infrared Port	Yes	No

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	No
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM 850/900/1800MHz	GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800
3G Bands	WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B8/B19	UMTS B1(2100), B5(850), B8(900)
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)	LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41)
LTE category	n/a	7
5G Support	Yes	No

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Mono
3.5 mm Jack	No	Yes
FM Radio	No	Yes
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Max Volume

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

n/a

Samsung Galaxy M32

79.7 dB

Other

Class	Flagship	Mid-range
Announced	November, 2024 yr	June, 2021 yr
Release Date	November, 2024 yr	June, 2021 yr
Launch Price ($)	399	350
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	Yes 120 W	n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo IQOO Neo 10 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Vivo IQOO Neo 10

0 (0%)

Samsung Galaxy M32

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Vivo IQOO Neo 10 vs Samsung Galaxy M32

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments