Vivo IQOO Neo 10 vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo IQOO Neo 10 Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Tecno Pova 4 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2022 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo IQOO Neo 10
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 199g vs 211g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6100mAh vs 6000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 4 Pro

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB
    8/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 and Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED AMOLED
    Size 6.78 in 6.66 in
    Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
    Pixel density 453 ppi 403 ppi
    Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
    Max brightness 1800 nits 450 nits
    HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
    Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 90.4 % 84.4 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming
    n/a

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 162.92 mm (6.41 in) 164.79 mm (6.49 in)
    Width 75.4 mm (2.97 in) 77 mm (3.03 in)
    Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 in) 9.19 mm (0.36 in)
    Weight 199 g (7.02 oz) 211 g (7.44 oz)
    Water resistance IP54 No
    Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
    Back panel Glass Plastic
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - White
    - Black
    - Orange
    - Gray
    - Blue
    - Red
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    90.4 %
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    84.4 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo IQOO Neo 10 and Tecno Pova 4 Pro In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 MediaTek Helio G99
    Max Frequency 3300 MHz 2200 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520)
    - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720)
    - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
    - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
    Neural Processor Hexagon Yes
    Graphics Adreno 750 Mali-G57 MP2
    GPU Cores 1536 128
    GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
    FLOPS 2774 GFLOPS 128 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    2212
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    731
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    6767
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    1889
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2212731
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)67671889
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)17148n/a
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    2093618
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    403684
    CPU458825128793
    GPU90326357376
    Memory394291108333
    UX337239109182
    NanoReview Score2093618403684
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    n/a
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    1254
    Stabilityn/a99 %
    Graphics Testn/a7 fps
    Graphics Scoren/a1254
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Vivo IQOO Neo 10
    n/a
    Tecno Pova 4 Pro
    10284
    Writing scoren/a13149
    Web scoren/a8030
    Video editingn/a6274
    Data manipulationn/a6839
    NanoReview Scoren/a10284

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 12 GB
    - 16 GB
    8 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 4800 MHz 2133 MHz
    Channels 4 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB
    - 1024 GB
    256 GB
    Storage Typen/aUFS 2.2
    Memory Cardn/aMicroSD

    Software

    OS Android 15 Android 12
    UI Skin OriginOS 5 HiOS 8.6

    Battery

    Volume 6100 mAh 6000 mAh
    Max Charging Power 120 W 45 W
    Battery Type Silicon Carbon Li-ion
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (50% in 15 min) Yes (50% in 24 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:30 h n/a

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8190x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Optical Digital
    8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) n/a
    Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 2 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Bokeh effect
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
    SensorSony IMX921n/a
    Sensor size1/1.56n/a
    Pixel size1 μmn/a
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix8 MPn/a
    Aperturef/2.2n/a
    SensorOmnivision OV08D10n/a
    Sensor size1/4n/a
    Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
    StabilizationDigitaln/a

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 8 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 3264x2448 pixels
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
    Sensor Samsung S5K3P9 n/a
    Sensor size 1/3.1 n/a
    Pixel size 1 μm n/a
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    DisplayPort No n/a
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes No
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzn/a
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B8/B19n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)n/a
    LTE categoryn/a13
    5G SupportYesNo

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo Stereo
    3.5 mm Jack No Yes
    FM Radio No Yes
    Dolby Atmos Yes No

    Other

    Class Flagship Mid-range
    Announced November, 2024 yr October, 2022 yr
    Release Date November, 2024 yr October, 2022 yr
    Launch Price ($) 399 265
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 120 W Yes 45 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo IQOO Neo 10 the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below