Vivo iQOO Neo 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi 17C
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Neo 9 Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Xiaomi Redmi 17C, Manufactured in June, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Neo 9
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 206g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 17C
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 85.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.53 mm (6.44 in) | 171.88 mm (6.77 in) |
| Width | 75.68 mm (2.98 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8.34 mm (0.33 in) | 8.22 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Red |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2070 | 400 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5653 | 1377 |
| CPU | 388254 | 117408 |
| GPU | 630269 | 43406 |
| Memory | 312977 | 116051 |
| UX | 300596 | 87805 |
| NanoReview Score | 1632096 | 364670 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 4 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5160 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 120 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (40% in 9 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:21 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX920 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.49 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3P9 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | GSM B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B1/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41 | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B28) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B34/B38/B39/B40) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | December, 2023 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 600 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 120 W | Yes, 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Neo 9 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0