Home Phone comparison Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT - Which is better?

Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

81 out 100
Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
VS
63 out 100
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus Manufactured in July, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco F4 GT, Manufactured in April, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 198g vs 210g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 4700mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB    		 - 8/128 GB
    - 12/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    vs
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED AMOLED
    Size 6.78 in 6.67 in
    Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2400 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
    Pixel density 453 ppi 395 ppi
    Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
    Max brightness 1400 nits 500 nits
    HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
    Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 480 Hz
    Screen-to-body ratio 89.7 % 86.2 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming    		 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming
    Display test
    Peak brightness (auto)
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    n/a
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    753 nits
    sRGB gamutn/a98.7 %
    PWM (Flicker)n/a121 Hz
    Response timen/a1 ms
    Contrastn/a∞ Infinite
    Sources: NotebookCheck [Xiaomi Poco F4 GT]

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 163.53 mm (6.44 in) 162.5 mm (6.4 in)
    Width 75.68 mm (2.98 in) 76.7 mm (3.02 in)
    Thickness 8.34 mm (0.33 in) 8.5 mm (0.33 in)
    Weight 198 g (6.98 oz) 210 g (7.41 oz)
    Water resistance IP64 No
    Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
    Back panel Glass Glass
    Frame Plastic Metal
    Colors - White
    - Black    		 - Black
    - Silver
    - Yellow
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    89.7 %
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    86.2 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus and Xiaomi Poco F4 GT In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
    Max Frequency 3300 MHz 3000 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
    Architecture - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520)
    - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720)
    - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)    		 - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510)
    - 3/2.5 (Cortex-A710)
    - 1/3 (Cortex-X2)
    Process TSMC Samsung
    Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor Hexagon Hexagon
    Graphics Adreno 750 Adreno 730
    GPU Cores 1536 1024
    GPU Frequency 903-1000 MHz 818 MHz
    FLOPS 2774 GFLOPS 1675.3 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    2253
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    992
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    6847
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    3660
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2253992
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)68473660
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)16496n/a
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    2101665
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    1182484
    CPU469305314651
    GPU903104443364
    Memory371750206516
    UX357506217953
    NanoReview Score21016651182484
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    17108
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    9325
    Max Surface Temp.n/a40.7 °C
    Stabilityn/a50 %
    Graphics Testn/a55 fps
    Graphics Scoren/a9325
    Sources: 3DMark [Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus], [Xiaomi Poco F4 GT]
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    14030
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    13091
    Writing score1899515018
    Web score1134311649
    Video editing65177469
    Data manipulation116889824
    NanoReview Score1403013091

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 12 GB
    - 16 GB    		 - 8 GB
    - 12 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
    Memory Frequency n/a 3200 MHz
    Channels 4 4
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB
    - 1024 GB    		- 128 GB
    - 256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
    Memory CardNoNo

    Software

    OS Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
    OS Size n/a 33 GB
    UI Skin OriginOS 5 HyperOS 2.0

    Battery

    Volume 5500 mAh 4700 mAh
    Max Charging Power 120 W 120 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes No
    Fast Charging Yes (70% in 17 min) Yes (50% in 8 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:28 h 0:17 h
    Battery Life Test
    Battery Life
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    n/a
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    16:47
    Web Browsingn/a06:53 h
    Video Playbackn/a11:18 h
    Gamesn/a04:25 h
    Standby Moden/a73 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 9248x6936 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Optical Digital
    8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion 480 fps (1080p) 960 fps (720p)
    Wide-angle lens 119 ° 120 °
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 50 MP    		 Standard: 64 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Macro: 2 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP64 MP
    Aperturef/1.9f/1.7
    Focal lengthn/a26 mm
    SensorSony IMX921Sony IMX686
    Sensor size1/1.561/1.73
    Pixel size1 μm0.8 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix50 MP8 MP
    Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
    SensorSamsung S5KJN1Omnivision OV8856
    Sensor size1/2.761/4.0
    Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
    StabilizationDigitalDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 20 MP
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.4
    Sensor CMOS Sony IMX596
    Sensor size n/a 1/2
    Pixel size n/a 0.8 μm
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
    Bluetooth features LE LE, HID, A2DP
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No n/a
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - NAVIC
    NFC* Yes Varies by region
    Infrared Port Yes Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzGSM 2 / 3 / 5 / 8
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19WCDMA 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 19
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41)
    LTE categoryn/a20
    5G SupportYesYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo Stereo
    3.5 mm Jack No No
    FM Radio No No
    Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
    Speaker Test
    Max Volume
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus
    n/a
    Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
    86.6 dB

    Other

    Class Flagship Flagship
    Announced July, 2024 yr April, 2022 yr
    Release Date July, 2024 yr April, 2022 yr
    Launch Price ($) 565 500
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 120 W Yes 120 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    1 (100%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 1

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below