Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Samsung Galaxy A17 4G, Manufactured in September, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A17 4G

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/512 GB
    - 16/1024 GB
    - 4/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro and Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
    Size 6.78 in 6.7 in
    Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2340 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
    Pixel density 453 ppi 385 ppi
    Refresh rate 144 Hz 90 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
    Max brightness 1400 nits 800 nits
    HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
    Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 89.7 % 86 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming
    DCI-P3

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 163.53 mm (6.44 in) 164.4 mm (6.47 in)
    Width 75.68 mm (2.98 in) 77.9 mm (3.07 in)
    Thickness 8.34 mm (0.33 in) 7.5 mm (0.3 in)
    Weight 190 g (6.7 oz) 190 g (6.7 oz)
    Water resistance IP54 IP54
    Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
    Back panel Glass Plastic
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - White
    - Black
    - Red
    - Black
    - Gray
    - Blue
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    89.7 %
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    86 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro and Samsung Galaxy A17 4G In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus MediaTek Helio G99
    Max Frequency 3400 MHz 2200 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
    - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4)
    - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
    Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 Yes
    Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G57 MP2
    GPU Cores 1536 64
    GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 1000 MHz
    FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS 128 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    2202
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    729
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    7215
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    2009
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2202729
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)72152009
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)146111257
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    2115448
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    n/a
    CPU500675n/a
    GPU877739n/a
    Memory381512n/a
    UX355522n/a
    NanoReview Score2115448n/a
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    15598
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    n/a
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro
    14164
    Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
    n/a
    Writing score22589n/a
    Web score11620n/a
    Video editing5655n/a
    Data manipulation11210n/a
    NanoReview Score14164n/a

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 8 GB
    - 12 GB
    - 16 GB
    4 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 4800 MHz 2133 MHz
    Channels 4 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB
    - 1024 GB
    128 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 4.0n/a
    Memory CardNoMicroSD

    Software

    OS Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) Android 15
    OS Size n/a 22.2 GB
    UI Skin OriginOS 5 One UI 7.0

    Battery

    Volume 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
    Max Charging Power 120 W 25 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes No
    Fast Charging Yes (40% in 9 min) Yes (44% in 30 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:21 h 1:28 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6120 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED LED
    Stabilization Optical No
    8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    Slow Motion 480 fps (1080p) 120 fps (720p)
    Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 50 MP
    Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 5 MP
    Macro: 2 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.9f/1.8
    Focal lengthn/a64 mm
    SensorSony IMX920n/a
    Sensor size1/1.311/2.76
    Pixel size1.2 μmn/a
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalNo
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix50 MP5 MP
    Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
    SensorSamsung S5KJN1n/a
    Sensor size1/2.761/5
    Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
    StabilizationDigitalNo

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 13 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 4160x3120 pixels
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.0
    Focal length n/a 26 mm
    Sensor CMOS n/a
    Sensor size n/a 1/3.1
    Pixel size n/a 1.12 μm
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital No
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - NAVIC
    - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Yes Varies by region
    Infrared Port Yes No
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzGSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66)
    5G SupportYesNo

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo n/a
    3.5 mm Jack No No
    FM Radio No Yes
    Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

    Other

    Class Flagship Budget
    Announced May, 2024 yr September, 2025 yr
    Release Date May, 2024 yr September, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 410 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 169
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 120 W No
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Neo 9S Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below