Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400, vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10R 5G
- Lighter design: 183.5g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 453ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5700mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 1280x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.29 mm (6.43 in) | 162.8 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 7.39 mm (0.29 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 183.5 g (6.47 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IPX9 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Active fan |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Silver |
- Black - Silver - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Adreno 825 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| FLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS | 2355.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | n/a | 2135 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | n/a | 6613 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 18374 |
| CPU | n/a | 488465 |
| GPU | n/a | 879994 |
| Memory | n/a | 358672 |
| UX | n/a | 323198 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 2050329 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | FuntouchOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 44 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (63% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:56 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.45 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800Mhz | GSM 900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | LTE B1/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | July, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 210 | 359 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 44 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0