Home Phone comparison Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus and Tecno Pova 5 Pro - Which is better?

Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus vs Tecno Pova 5 Pro

83 out 100
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
VS
54 out 100
Tecno Pova 5 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
Tecno Pova 5 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus, vs Tecno Pova 5 Pro, Manufactured in August, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6080. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 196g vs 220g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6400mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 5 Pro

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/256 GB
    - 16/512 GB    		 - 8/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus and Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    vs
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED IPS LCD
    Size 6.78 in 6.78 in
    Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 21:9
    Pixel density 453 ppi 396 ppi
    Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
    Max brightness 1300 nits 580 nits
    HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
    Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
    Screen-to-body ratio 89.3 % 83.3 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming    		 DCI-P3
    Display test
    Peak brightness (auto)
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    n/a
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    505 nits

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 163.72 mm (6.45 in) 168.5 mm (6.63 in)
    Width 75.88 mm (2.99 in) 76.5 mm (3.01 in)
    Thickness 7.98 mm (0.31 in) 9 mm (0.35 in)
    Weight 196 g (6.91 oz) 220 g (7.76 oz)
    Water resistance IP64 No
    Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
    Back panel Plastic Plastic
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - White
    - Black
    - Gray    		 - Black
    - Silver
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    89.3 %
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    83.3 %

    Performance

    Testing Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus and Tecno Pova 5 Pro In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9300 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 6080
    Max Frequency 3400 MHz 2400 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A720)
    - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4)
    - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4)    		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
    Neural Processor MediaTek APU 790 Yes
    Graphics Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G57 MP2
    GPU Cores 1536 128
    GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 1068 MHz
    FLOPS 3993.6 GFLOPS 136.7 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    2226
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    765
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    7125
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    2102
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2226765
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)71252102
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)15507n/a
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    2117738
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    432940
    CPU509925143123
    GPU85299268312
    Memory394643105927
    UX360178115578
    NanoReview Score2117738432940

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 12 GB
    - 16 GB    		 8 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 2417 MHz 2133 MHz
    Channels 4 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB    		- 128 GB
    - 256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
    Memory CardNoMicroSD

    Software

    OS Android 14 Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
    UI Skin OriginOS 4 HIOS 14

    Battery

    Volume 6400 mAh 5000 mAh
    Max Charging Power 80 W 68 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (50% in 23 min) Yes (70% in 30 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:47 h 0:50 h
    Battery Life Test
    Battery Life
    Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus
    n/a
    Tecno Pova 5 Pro
    20:05
    Web Browsingn/a07:08 h
    Video Playbackn/a11:32 h
    Gamesn/a05:03 h
    Standby Moden/a107 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8190x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Optical Digital
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) n/a
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 0.08 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
    SensorSony LYT-600n/a
    Sensor size1/1.95n/a
    Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix8 MPn/a
    Aperturef/2.2n/a
    SensorGalaxyCore GC08A3n/a
    Sensor size1/4n/a
    Pixel size1.12 μmn/a
    StabilizationDigitaln/a

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 16 MP
    Aperture f/2.5 f/2.0
    Sensor Samsung S5K3P9 n/a
    Sensor size 1/3.0 n/a
    Pixel size 1 μm n/a
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.4 5
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No n/a
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - NAVIC    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes No
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzn/a
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B5/B8n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)n/a
    5G SupportYesYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo Stereo
    3.5 mm Jack No Yes
    FM Radio No Yes
    Dolby Atmos No No

    Other

    Class Flagship Mid-range
    Announced September, 2024 yr August, 2023 yr
    Release Date September, 2024 yr August, 2023 yr
    Launch Price ($) 310 230
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 80 W Yes 68 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below