Home Phone comparison Vivo T3 Ultra and Cubot Max 5 - Which is better?

Vivo T3 Ultra vs Cubot Max 5

77 out 100
Vivo T3 Ultra
VS
63 out 100
Cubot Max 5
Vivo T3 Ultra
Cubot Max 5

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo T3 Ultra Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 9200 Plus, vs Cubot Max 5, Manufactured in July, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo T3 Ultra
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Lighter design: 192g vs 223g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5100mAh
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Cubot Max 5
  • Larger display: 6.95in
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB		 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo T3 Ultra and Cubot Max 5
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo T3 Ultra
vs
Cubot Max 5

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.78 in 6.95 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1080x2460 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 21:9
Pixel density 453 ppi 387 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes n/a
Max brightness 4500 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.2 % 82.2 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.16 mm (6.46 in) 173.9 mm (6.85 in)
Width 74.93 mm (2.95 in) 78.9 mm (3.11 in)
Thickness 7.58 mm (0.3 in) 9.2 mm (0.36 in)
Weight 192 g (6.77 oz) 223 g (7.87 oz)
Water resistance IP68 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - Gray
- Green		 - White
- Black
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo T3 Ultra
90.2 %
Cubot Max 5
82.2 %

Performance

Testing Vivo T3 Ultra and Cubot Max 5 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 9200 Plus MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Max Frequency 3350 MHz 3100 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A715)
- 1/3.35 (Cortex-X3)		 - 4/2 (Cortex A55)
- 3/3 (Cortex A78)
- 1/3.1 (Cortex A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 690 MediaTek APU 580
Graphics Mali-G715 Immortalis MP11 Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Cores 2112 768
GPU Frequency 995 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS 4202.8 GFLOPS 1442 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo T3 Ultra
1833
Cubot Max 5
1241
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo T3 Ultra
5109
Cubot Max 5
3810
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)18331241
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)51093810
Geekbench Compute (GPU)117574716
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo T3 Ultra], [Cubot Max 5]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo T3 Ultra
1471219
Cubot Max 5
848857
CPU396387242170
GPU515085222177
Memory261806186614
UX297941197896
NanoReview Score1471219848857

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 128 GB
- 256 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 14 Android 14
UI Skin Funtouch 14 n/a

Battery

Volume 5500 mAh 5100 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 33 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (70% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:47 h 2:00 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 100 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Wide-angle lens 120 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP		 Standard: 100 MP
Macro: 5 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP100 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Focal length24 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX921Omnivision OVA0B40
Sensor size1/1.561/1.8
Pixel size1 μm0.61 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.4n/a
Sensor size1/4.0n/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.3
Focal length 21 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Sony IMX616
Sensor size 1/2.76 1/2.8
Pixel size 0.64 μm 0.8 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* No Yes
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B4/B5/B8WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41)LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No n/a
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced September, 2024 yr July, 2024 yr
Release Date September, 2024 yr July, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 385 265
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 80 W Yes 33 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo T3 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below