Vivo T3x vs Realme Note 70
63
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo T3x Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 6.72 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, vs Realme Note 70, Manufactured in September, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo T3x
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 199g vs 201g
Reasons to choose Realme Note 70
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher battery capacity: 6300mAh vs 6000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.72 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5 % | 85.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.7 mm (6.52 in) | 167.2 mm (6.58 in) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 in) | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 7.94 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Green - Brown |
- Black - Gold |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 676 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 346.1 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 927 | 433 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2619 | 1420 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1751 | 719 |
| CPU | 204527 | 89654 |
| GPU | 110161 | 25015 |
| Memory | 131543 | 72102 |
| UX | 139803 | 77854 |
| NanoReview Score | 586034 | 264625 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 14 | Realme UI 6.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 44 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 26 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:12 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K4H7 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800 MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B)/B1/B3/B5/B8/B28B/B38/B40/B41(25352655) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 44 W | Yes, 15 W |
Note
Vivo T3x:
Almost the same specs as iQOO Z9x5G.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo T3x the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
