Vivo V50 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo V50 5G Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo V50 5G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9T
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 198g vs 199g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 96.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 880 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 42 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1868:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.29 mm (6.43 in) | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 76.72 mm (3.02 in) | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 7.39 mm (0.29 in) | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Red |
- Gray - Blue - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
| Max Frequency | 2630 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 11 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 683 |
| Graphics | Adreno 720 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1137 | 511 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3136 | 1551 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3733 | n/a |
| CPU | 258924 | 89386 |
| GPU | 254618 | 34918 |
| Memory | 127948 | 60894 |
| UX | 159498 | 61570 |
| NanoReview Score | 801066 | 247218 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 45.3 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 373 |
| Writing score | n/a | 6932 |
| Web score | n/a | 5529 |
| Video editing | n/a | 3683 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 5170 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 6197 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 43 min) | Yes (25% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:57 h | 2:30 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 11:57 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 15:26 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:05 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 175 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung JN1 | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | OmniVision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800 MHz | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 18 | 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 400 | 180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V50 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0