Vivo V60 Lite 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 3
69
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo V60 Lite 5G Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo, vs Tecno Spark Go 3, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo V60 Lite 5G
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 3
- Lighter design: 182g vs 194g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 84.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.77 mm (6.45 in) | 167.7 mm (6.6 in) |
| Width | 76.28 mm (3 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.59 mm (0.3 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP64 |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Pink |
- Black - Gray - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/3 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 657 | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1023 | 436 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2817 | 1416 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2525 | n/a |
| CPU | 339607 | 87139 |
| GPU | 126506 | 26538 |
| Memory | 203622 | 102815 |
| UX | 238509 | 69610 |
| NanoReview Score | 908244 | 286102 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 21 min) | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 1:54 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 22 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 99 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V60 Lite 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
