Vivo X100 Pro vs Google Pixel Fold
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Pro Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Google Pixel Fold, Manufactured in June, 2023 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Lighter design: 225g vs 283g
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 4821mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel Fold
- Larger display: 7.6in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 7.6 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1840x2208 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 6:5 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 378 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 82.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 98.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 369 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 4 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) | 158.7 mm (6.25 in) |
| Width | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) | 139.7 mm (5.5 in) |
| Thickness | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) | 5.8 mm (0.23 in) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IPX8 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Orange |
- Black - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Google Tensor G2 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 672 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2231 | 1501 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7526 | 3833 |
| CPU | 490601 | 207549 |
| GPU | 893392 | 143090 |
| Memory | 446780 | 171410 |
| UX | 321411 | 166227 |
| NanoReview Score | 2152184 | 688276 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 51.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 66 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 15478 | n/a |
| Writing score | 23039 | 15002 |
| Web score | 11895 | 9317 |
| Video editing | 5599 | 6962 |
| Data manipulation | 12384 | 10916 |
| NanoReview Score | 14116 | 11617 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | n/a | 15 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5400 mAh | 4821 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (20 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 31 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:31 h | 1:32 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:38 h | 06:15 h |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | 10:45 h |
| Games | 06:25 h | 04:29 h |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | 80 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 121 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 10.8 MP Ultra-wide: 10.8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Sony IMX787 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.1 |
| Focal length | 100 mm | 112 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX386 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.25 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | 60 |
| Preview | 81 | 63 |
| Zoom | 155 | 117 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH | GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B21/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B46/B48/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | 1799 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | No |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0