Vivo X100 Pro vs Honor X9d
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Pro Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Honor X9d, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Honor X9d
- Larger display: 6.79in
- Lighter design: 193g vs 225g
- Higher battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 5400mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.79 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1200x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.85:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 427 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 369 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) | 161.9 mm (6.37 in) |
| Width | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Orange |
- Black - Gold - Green - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.2 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.3 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2231 | 1086 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7526 | 3103 |
| CPU | 490601 | 358049 |
| GPU | 893392 | 160718 |
| Memory | 446780 | 210830 |
| UX | 321411 | 247707 |
| NanoReview Score | 2152184 | 977304 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 51.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 66 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 15478 | n/a |
| Writing score | 23039 | n/a |
| Web score | 11895 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5599 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 12384 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14116 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5400 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:31 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 09:38 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 100 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 81 | n/a |
| Zoom | 155 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 3456x4608 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes, 66 W |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0