Vivo X100 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a)
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Pro Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Nothing Phone (4a), Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5080mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Nothing Phone (4a)
- Lighter design: 205g vs 225g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 87.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 369 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) | 163.9 mm (6.45 in) |
| Width | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) | 77.5 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Orange |
- White - Black - Blue - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)) - 1/2.7 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2231 | 1249 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7526 | 3324 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 4758 |
| CPU | 490601 | 436685 |
| GPU | 893392 | 190776 |
| Memory | 446780 | 232120 |
| UX | 321411 | 289144 |
| NanoReview Score | 2152184 | 1148725 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 51.1 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 66 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 15478 | n/a |
| Writing score | 23039 | n/a |
| Web score | 11895 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5599 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 12384 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14116 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | Nothing OS 4.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5400 mAh | 5080 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 50 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 28 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:31 h | 1:12 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:38 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:25 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Samsung GN9 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/1.57 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.9 |
| Focal length | 100 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 81 | n/a |
| Zoom | 155 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.42 (0.29) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | UMTS B1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66/B71) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 349 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | No |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0