Vivo X100 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
86
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Pro Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, Manufactured in February, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 202g vs 225g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 85.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 90.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 369 Hz | 521 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) | 76.1 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) | 8.12 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Orange |
- White - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2231 | 916 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7526 | 2265 |
| CPU | 490601 | 132327 |
| GPU | 893392 | 102701 |
| Memory | 446780 | 78299 |
| UX | 321411 | 90934 |
| NanoReview Score | 2152184 | 404261 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 51.1 °C | 37.6 °C |
| Stability | 66 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 92 fps | 7 fps |
| Graphics Score | 15478 | 1199 |
| Writing score | 23039 | 11162 |
| Web score | 11895 | 7567 |
| Video editing | 5599 | 4159 |
| Data manipulation | 12384 | 7958 |
| NanoReview Score | 14116 | 8598 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 31 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch 15 | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (74% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:31 h | 0:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:38 h | 07:57 h |
| Video Playback | 14:53 h | 12:43 h |
| Games | 06:25 h | 05:33 h |
| Standby Mode | 94 h | 119 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Samsung S5KHM2 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/1.52 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 100 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 70 | n/a |
| Preview | 81 | n/a |
| Zoom | 155 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | Omnivision OV16A1Q |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH | GSM 850 900 1800 1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 800 | 329 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes 67 W |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
