Vivo X100 Ultra vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro
88
out 100
VS
74
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Huawei Mate 50 Pro, Manufactured in September, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 4700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Lighter design: 209g vs 229g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1212x2616 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 428 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 91 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 119 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 in) | 162.1 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 75.5 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Gray |
- Black - Silver - Orange - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 3190 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 730 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 1843.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2292 | 1740 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7005 | 4379 |
| CPU | 454762 | 347330 |
| GPU | 786308 | 479118 |
| Memory | 395610 | 189225 |
| UX | 348724 | 221513 |
| NanoReview Score | 1985404 | 1237186 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 46.9 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 39 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 61 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 10268 |
| Writing score | 18970 | n/a |
| Web score | 10974 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6450 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 12481 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14201 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | Nano Memory |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 13 |
| OS Size | n/a | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | EMUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:48 h | 0:41 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:19 h | 06:35 h |
| Video Playback | 14:26 h | 13:12 h |
| Games | 05:35 h | 05:03 h |
| Standby Mode | 99 h | 84 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 3840 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/3.5 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 90 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Sony IMX688 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 80 |
| Preview | n/a | 63 |
| Zoom | n/a | 148 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4160x3120 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | Yes |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes DP 1.2 |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM Bands 2/3/5/8(1900/1800/850/900 MHz) |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | September, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | September, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | 1199 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
