Vivo X100 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
88
out 100
VS
75
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2022 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Ultra
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Lighter design: 228g vs 229g
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 1440x3088 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.3:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 500 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (24-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 830 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 89.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 98.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 120 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 228 g (8.04 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Gray |
- White - Black - Gray - Blue - Green - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.82 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.52 (Cortex-A710) - 1/2.8 (Cortex-X2) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 2006.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2292 | 1710 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7005 | 3809 |
| CPU | 454762 | 315483 |
| GPU | 786308 | 346984 |
| Memory | 395610 | 183253 |
| UX | 348724 | 233537 |
| NanoReview Score | 1985404 | 1079257 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 39.7 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 64 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 41 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 6875 |
| Writing score | 18970 | 15799 |
| Web score | 10974 | 11474 |
| Video editing | 6450 | 7200 |
| Data manipulation | 12481 | 11082 |
| NanoReview Score | 14201 | 13071 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | n/a | 26.8 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (60% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:48 h | 0:59 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:19 h | 09:06 h |
| Video Playback | 14:26 h | 13:47 h |
| Games | 05:35 h | 05:57 h |
| Standby Mode | 99 h | 113 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 10x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Telephoto: 10 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | Samsung S5KHM3 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/1.33 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 10 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/4.9 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 230 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony IMX574 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/3.52 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Sony IMX563 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 73 |
| Zoom | n/a | 141 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 40 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 7864x5200 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.82 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes DP 1.2 |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | 1199 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
