Vivo X100 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco C85
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X100 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Poco C85, Manufactured in September, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Ultra
- Higher pixel density: 517ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C85
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Lighter design: 205g vs 229g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5500mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3200 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 3000 nits | 810 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 84.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 in) | 171.56 mm (6.75 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 79.47 mm (3.13 in) |
| Thickness | 9.2 mm (0.36 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Gray |
- Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3300 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 820 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2292 | 408 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7005 | 1375 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 971 |
| CPU | 454762 | 82711 |
| GPU | 786308 | 34920 |
| Memory | 395610 | 69962 |
| UX | 348724 | 85320 |
| NanoReview Score | 1985404 | 272913 |
| Writing score | 18970 | n/a |
| Web score | 10974 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6450 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 12481 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14201 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 31 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:48 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 10:19 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:26 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:35 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 99 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-900 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 200 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 85 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8/6/19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2024 yr | September, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 900 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0