Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Pro mini and Asus Zenfone 9 - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Asus Zenfone 9

91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro mini
VS
70 out 100
Asus Zenfone 9
Vivo X200 Pro mini
Asus Zenfone 9

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Asus Zenfone 9, Manufactured in August, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Larger display: 6.31in
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 4300mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Asus Zenfone 9
  • Lighter design: 169g vs 187g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 16/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 Pro mini and Asus Zenfone 9
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200 Pro mini
vs
Asus Zenfone 9

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.31 in 5.9 in
Resolution 1216x2640 pixels 1080x2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 445 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
Max brightness n/a 800 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 84.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
1803 nits
Asus Zenfone 9
830 nits
sRGB gamut99.8 %98.8 %
PWM (Flicker)361 Hz478 Hz
Response time1 ms2 ms
Contrast∞ Infinite∞ Infinite
Sources: NotebookCheck [Vivo X200 Pro mini], [Asus Zenfone 9]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 150.8 mm (5.94 in) 146.5 mm (5.77 in)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 in) 68.1 mm (2.68 in)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 in) 9.1 mm (0.36 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 169 g (5.96 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP68
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Green
- Pink		 - White
- Black
- Blue
- Red
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200 Pro mini
90.3 %
Asus Zenfone 9
84.3 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 Pro mini and Asus Zenfone 9 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 3190 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 730
GPU Cores 1536 1024
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 900 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 1843.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2696
Asus Zenfone 9
1776
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
8536
Asus Zenfone 9
4732
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)26961776
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)85364732
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Pro mini]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2452559
Asus Zenfone 9
1364290
CPU550000399673
GPU1124744499023
Memory382394194900
UX395421270694
NanoReview Score24525591364290

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 - 8 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 3200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 128 GB
- 256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14)
OS Size 55 GB n/a
UI Skin OriginOS 5 ZenUI 9

Battery

Volume 5700 mAh 4300 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 30 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (57% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:52 h 1:15 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro mini
28:40
Asus Zenfone 9
21:01
Web Browsing11:58 h08:26 h
Video Playback18:31 h14:17 h
Games05:59 h05:47 h
Standby Mode131 h92 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No Up to 24FPS
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 480 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 113 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Focal length23 mm238 mm
SensorSony LYT-818Sony IMX766
Sensor size1/1.281/1.56
Pixel size1.22 μm1 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mm144 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Sony IMX363
Sensor size1/2.761/2.55
Pixel size0.64 μm1.4 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 12 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 4247x2826 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 20 mm 275 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Sony IMX663
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/2.93
Pixel size n/a 1.22 μm
Autofocus n/a Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aEDGE/GPRS/GSM (2, 3, 5, 8)
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA (Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19)
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B(B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42))
LTE categoryn/a20
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200 Pro mini
85.7 dB
Asus Zenfone 9
88 dB

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr July, 2022 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr August, 2022 yr
Launch Price ($) 650 800
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Hall Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 30 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below