Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus
91
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus, Manufactured in February, 2022 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 920. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.4in
- Lighter design: 182g vs 187g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 in | 6.4 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 411 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 95.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 361 Hz | 218 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 9 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) | 160.2 mm (6.31 in) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) | 73.3 mm (2.89 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green - Pink |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 920 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2696 | 928 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8536 | 2323 |
| CPU | 550000 | 168137 |
| GPU | 1124744 | 114289 |
| Memory | 382394 | 106004 |
| UX | 395421 | 152474 |
| NanoReview Score | 2452559 | 540904 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 46.9 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 13 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 2293 |
| Writing score | n/a | 19093 |
| Web score | n/a | 9133 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6657 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 8425 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 12629 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 55 GB | 15 GB |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | Realme UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 60 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (62% in 30 min) | Yes (77% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 0:49 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:58 h | 09:24 h |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | 12:57 h |
| Games | 05:59 h | 05:39 h |
| Standby Mode | 131 h | 98 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8700x5800 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 4 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.14 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Sony IMX471 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/3.13 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM (850/900/1800/1900) |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA (850/900/1700/1900/2100) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 650 | 330 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 60 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
