Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Realme GT Neo 3, Manufactured in March, 2022with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 187g vs 188g
- Higher battery capacity: 5700mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 394 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 1000 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 87.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 100 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 361 Hz | 359 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 11 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green - Pink |
- Black - Silver - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.85 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek APU 580 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 860 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1309 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2696 | 1096 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8536 | 3393 |
| CPU | 550000 | 249904 |
| GPU | 1124744 | 215630 |
| Memory | 382394 | 183608 |
| UX | 395421 | 228973 |
| NanoReview Score | 2452559 | 878115 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 48.5 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 33 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 5650 |
| Writing score | n/a | 20973 |
| Web score | n/a | 11338 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6664 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9389 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14531 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 55 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | Realme UI 3.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (62% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 12 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 0:33 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:58 h | 08:56 h |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | 13:29 h |
| Games | 05:59 h | 05:25 h |
| Standby Mode | 131 h | 104 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Samsung S5K3P9 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/3.09 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 650 | 410 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0