Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Oppo Reno 14
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Reno 14, Manufactured in May, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
- Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 14
- Larger display: 6.59in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5700mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 pixels | 1256x2760 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | n/a | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 89.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 361 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) | 157.9 mm (6.22 in) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) | 74.73 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 7.42 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green - Pink |
- White - Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 |
| Max Frequency | 3620 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2696 | 1439 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8536 | 4389 |
| CPU | 550000 | 289832 |
| GPU | 1124744 | 518207 |
| Memory | 382394 | 261305 |
| UX | 395421 | 258529 |
| NanoReview Score | 2452559 | 1327873 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 55 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | OriginOS 5 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (62% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 0:50 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:58 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:59 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 131 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.6 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX355 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung KD1 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.6 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 650 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 400 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2