Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Pro mini and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global) - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)

91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro mini
VS
81 out 100
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global), Manufactured in July, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 188g
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
  • Larger display: 6.32in
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6700mAh vs 5700mAh
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 Pro mini and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200 Pro mini
vs
Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 in 6.32 in
Resolution 1216x2640 pixels 1216x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness n/a 1800 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 89.6 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
1803 nits
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
1865 nits
sRGB gamut99.8 %n/a
PWM (Flicker)361 Hzn/a
Response time1 msn/a
Contrast∞ Infiniten/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [Vivo X200 Pro mini]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 150.8 mm (5.94 in) 151.21 mm (5.95 in)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 in) 72.42 mm (2.85 in)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 188 g (6.63 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel n/a Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Green
- Pink		 - White
- Black
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200 Pro mini
90.3 %
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
89.6 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 Pro mini and Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global) In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3.2 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.4 (Cortex-A725)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 MediaTek NPU 880
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 n/a
GPU Cores 1536 n/a
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz n/a
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2696
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
1567
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
8536
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
5965
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)26961567
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)85365965
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Pro mini], [Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2452559
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
2429134
CPU550000612932
GPU1124744952016
Memory382394394012
UX395421470174
NanoReview Score24525592429134

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz n/a
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
OS Size 55 GB n/a
UI Skin OriginOS 5 ColorOS 16

Battery

Volume 5700 mAh 6700 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 80 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:52 h 1:03 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro mini
28:40
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
n/a
Web Browsing11:58 hn/a
Video Playback18:31 hn/a
Games05:59 hn/a
Standby Mode131 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 16320x12240 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 960 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 116 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Focal length23 mm24 mm
SensorSony LYT-818Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP5
Sensor size1/1.281/1.56 (0.64)
Pixel size1.22 μm0.5 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.6f/2.8
Focal length70 mm80 mm
SensorSony IMX882Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size1/1.951/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size0.7 μm0.64 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.0
Focal length15 mm16 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN1GalaxyCore GC50F6
Sensor size1/2.761/2.88 (0.35)
Pixel size0.64 μm0.61 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 18 mm
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
Autofocus n/a Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66/B71)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200 Pro mini
85.7 dB
Oppo Reno 16 Pro 5G (Global)
n/a

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr June, 2026 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr July, 2026 yr
Launch Price ($) 650 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 899
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below