Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Pro mini and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo

91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro mini
VS
77 out 100
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Vivo X200 Pro mini
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro mini Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.31 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo, Manufactured in April, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro mini
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 194.9g
  • Supports DisplayPort
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5700mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 Pro mini and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200 Pro mini
vs
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.31 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1216x2640 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 89.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
1803 nits
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
n/a
sRGB gamut99.8 %n/a
PWM (Flicker)361 Hzn/a
Response time1 msn/a
Contrast∞ Infiniten/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [Vivo X200 Pro mini]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 150.8 mm (5.94 in) 163.72 mm (6.45 in)
Width 71.8 mm (2.83 in) 75.88 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 in) 7.98 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 194.9 g (6.87 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP64
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel n/a Glass
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Green
- Pink		 - White
- Black
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200 Pro mini
90.3 %
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
89.3 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 Pro mini and Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Max Frequency 3620 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 3/2 (Cortex-A520)
- 4/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 735
GPU Cores 1536 768
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 1689.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2696
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
1965
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro mini
8536
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
5187
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)26961965
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)85365187
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a10406
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Pro mini], [Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200 Pro mini
2452559
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
1501794
CPU550000381507
GPU1124744541551
Memory382394287552
UX395421291184
NanoReview Score24525591501794
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200 Pro mini
n/a
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
11216
Sources: 3DMark [Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200 Pro mini
n/a
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
12475
Writing scoren/a14978
Web scoren/a9849
Video editingn/a6161
Data manipulationn/a12844
NanoReview Scoren/a12475

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 4200 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 256 GB
- 512 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 14
OS Size 55 GB n/a
UI Skin OriginOS 5 OriginOS 4

Battery

Volume 5700 mAh 6000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 80 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (62% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 17 min)
Full Charge Time 0:52 h 0:39 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro mini
28:40
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
n/a
Web Browsing11:58 hn/a
Video Playback18:31 hn/a
Games05:59 hn/a
Standby Mode131 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Focal length23 mmn/a
SensorSony LYT-818Sony LYT-600
Sensor size1/1.281/1.95
Pixel size1.22 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.6n/a
Focal length70 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX882n/a
Sensor size1/1.95n/a
Pixel size0.7 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN1GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size1/2.761/4
Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 16 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.5
Focal length 20 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung KD1 Samsung S5K3P9
Sensor size 1/3.44 1/3.0
Pixel size n/a 1 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1/B5/B8
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200 Pro mini
85.7 dB
Vivo iQOO Z9 Turbo
n/a

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced October, 2024 yr April, 2024 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr April, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 650 375
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro mini the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below