Vivo X200 Pro vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
91
out 100
VS
79
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, Manufactured in September, 2021with chipsetApple A15 Bionic. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Lighter design: 228g vs 240g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4352mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
- Higher pixel density: 458ppi
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 6/512 GB - 6/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1284x2778 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 458 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (10-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 87.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 238 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 8.5 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 in) | 160.8 mm (6.33 in) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 in) | 78.1 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 in) | 7.65 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 240 g (8.47 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Apple A15 Bionic |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 3230 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 6 (2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/2.02 (Blizzard) - 2/3.23 (Avalanche) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Apple Neural Engine |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Apple A15 GPU |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 640 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1338 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1712.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2848 | 2266 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8363 | 5459 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24447 | n/a |
| CPU | 600293 | 327704 |
| GPU | 1194784 | 434683 |
| Memory | 408283 | 248498 |
| UX | 443652 | 315845 |
| NanoReview Score | 2647012 | 1326730 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 45.8 °C |
| Stability | 55 % | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | 112 fps | 56 fps |
| Graphics Score | 18771 | 9444 |
| Writing score | 24851 | n/a |
| Web score | 14035 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5794 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 13748 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 15826 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | NVMe |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | iOS 15 (Upgradeable to iOS 18.3.2) |
| OS Size | n/a | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 4352 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 23 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (7.5 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (42% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 1:46 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:47 h | 11:16 h |
| Video Playback | 16:41 h | 17:03 h |
| Games | 07:44 h | 06:41 h |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | 136 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4032x3024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX703 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/1.66 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 1.9 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 77 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony IMX713 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX772 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 75 |
| Preview | n/a | 81 |
| Zoom | n/a | 119 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 4032x3024 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | Sony IMX514 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42 | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | Yes |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | n/a |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM/EDGE 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | UMTS 850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100 MHz |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B11/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B21/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | September, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | September, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 847 | 1100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
Note
Vivo X200 Pro:
The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
