Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro
VS
85 out 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Vivo X200 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
  • Higher pixel density: 452ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4400mAh
  • Infrared port
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Larger display: 8in
  • Lighter design: 215g vs 228g
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200 Pro
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 8 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 1968x2184 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 n/a
Pixel density 452 ppi 368 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 2000 nits n/a
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 90 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200 Pro
2028 nits
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.36 mm (6.39 in) 158.4 mm (6.24 in)
Width 75.92 mm (2.99 in) 143.2 mm (5.64 in)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 in) 4.2 mm (0.17 in)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 215 g (7.58 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP48
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue		 - Black
- Silver
- Blue
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200 Pro
90.1 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
90 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max Frequency 3630 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
- 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 830
GPU Cores 1536 1536
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 1200 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro
2848
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
2990
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro
8363
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
9783
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)28482990
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)83639783
Geekbench Compute (GPU)24447n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200 Pro
2647012
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
2771639
CPU600293658573
GPU11947841272549
Memory408283458582
UX443652381935
NanoReview Score26470122771639
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200 Pro
18771
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
n/a
Stability55 %n/a
Graphics Test112 fpsn/a
Graphics Score18771n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Vivo X200 Pro]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200 Pro
15826
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
n/a
Writing score24851n/a
Web score14035n/a
Video editing5794n/a
Data manipulation13748n/a
NanoReview Score15826n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
OS Size n/a 32.4 GB
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 One UI 8

Battery

Volume 6000 mAh 4400 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 25 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (73% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:46 h 1:40 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro
24:55
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
n/a
Web Browsing12:47 hn/a
Video Playback16:41 hn/a
Games07:44 hn/a
Standby Mode85 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 240 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) 960 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 119 ° 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 10 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/1.7
Focal length23 mm24 mm
SensorSony LYT-818Samsung ISOCELL HP2
Sensor size1/1.281/1.3
Pixel size1.22 μm0.6 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix200 MP10 MP
Aperturef/2.7f/2.4
Focal length85 mm67 mm
SensorSamsung ISOCELL HP9Samsung S5K3K1
Sensor size1/1.41/3.9
Pixel size0.56 μm1 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN1Samsung S5K3LU
Sensor size1/2.76n/a
Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 10 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 3648x2736 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm 24 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 n/a
Sensor size 1/3.42 n/a
Pixel size 0.64 μm n/a
Autofocus No n/a
Stabilization Digital n/a
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHzGSM (850/900/1800/1900)
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8WCDMA (850/1700/1900/2100)
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced October, 2024 yr July, 2025 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr July, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 847 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Hall Sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W No

Note

Vivo X200 Pro:

The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below