Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5160mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Lighter design: 215g vs 228g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/125 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1 % | 84.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 95.1 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 2404 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 37.4 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 995:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.36 mm (6.39 in) | 165.3 mm (6.51 in) |
| Width | 75.92 mm (2.99 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 in) | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 2960 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.96 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 675 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2848 | 973 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8363 | 2589 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24447 | n/a |
| CPU | 600293 | 181709 |
| GPU | 1194784 | 155743 |
| Memory | 408283 | 126967 |
| UX | 443652 | 177878 |
| NanoReview Score | 2647012 | 642297 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 44.1 °C |
| Stability | 55 % | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | 112 fps | 20 fps |
| Graphics Score | 18771 | 3456 |
| Writing score | 24851 | 13393 |
| Web score | 14035 | 8062 |
| Video editing | 5794 | 6035 |
| Data manipulation | 13748 | 8470 |
| NanoReview Score | 15826 | 10579 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | Funtouch OS 15 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 1:15 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:47 h | 08:43 h |
| Video Playback | 16:41 h | 12:45 h |
| Games | 07:44 h | 05:20 h |
| Standby Mode | 85 h | 117 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.7x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-818 | Sony IMX582 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 200 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 85 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 5480x3648 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.42 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 | UMTC B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | April, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 847 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | n/a |
Note
Vivo X200 Pro:
The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0