Home Phone comparison Vivo X200 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi A3 - Which is better?

Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi A3

91 out 100
Vivo X200 Pro
VS
40 out 100
Xiaomi Redmi A3
Vivo X200 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi A3

Compared 2 smartphones : Vivo X200 Pro Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Xiaomi Redmi A3, Manufactured in February, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 452ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A3
  • Lighter design: 199g vs 228g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 2/64 GB
- 3/64 GB
- 3/128 GB
- 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Vivo X200 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi A3
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Vivo X200 Pro
vs
Xiaomi Redmi A3

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.78 in 6.71 in
Resolution 1260x2800 pixels 720x1650 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 452 ppi 268 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) No
Max brightness 2000 nits 420 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision No
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 84.6 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Vivo X200 Pro
2028 nits
Xiaomi Redmi A3
357 nits
sRGB gamutn/a95.1 %
Response timen/a40 ms
Contrastn/a1314:1
Sources: NotebookCheck [Xiaomi Redmi A3]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.36 mm (6.39 in) 168.3 mm (6.63 in)
Width 75.92 mm (2.99 in) 76.3 mm (3 in)
Thickness 8.49 mm (0.33 in) 8.32 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Water resistance IP69 No
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Blue		 - Black
- Blue
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Vivo X200 Pro
90.1 %
Xiaomi Redmi A3
84.6 %

Performance

Testing Vivo X200 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi A3 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 MediaTek Helio G36
Max Frequency 3630 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925)		 - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 890 No
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 PowerVR GE8320
GPU Cores 1536 32
GPU Frequency 1612 MHz 680 MHz
FLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS 43.5 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro
2848
Xiaomi Redmi A3
230
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Vivo X200 Pro
8363
Xiaomi Redmi A3
840
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2848230
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)8363840
Geekbench Compute (GPU)24447n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X200 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Vivo X200 Pro
2647012
Xiaomi Redmi A3
153983
CPU60029355340
GPU119478410749
Memory40828342864
UX44365245030
NanoReview Score2647012153983
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Vivo X200 Pro
18771
Xiaomi Redmi A3
n/a
Stability55 %n/a
Graphics Test112 fpsn/a
Graphics Score18771n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Vivo X200 Pro]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Vivo X200 Pro
15826
Xiaomi Redmi A3
n/a
Writing score24851n/a
Web score14035n/a
Video editing5794n/a
Data manipulation13748n/a
NanoReview Score15826n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 12 GB
- 16 GB		 - 3 GB
- 4 GB
- 6 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz 1600 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 64 GB
- 128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 14
OS Size n/a 19 GB
UI Skin Funtouch OS 15 MIUI Go Edition

Battery

Volume 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 90 W 10 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (73% in 30 min) No
Full Charge Time 0:46 h 2:40 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Vivo X200 Pro
24:55
Xiaomi Redmi A3
n/a
Web Browsing12:47 hn/a
Video Playback16:41 hn/a
Games07:44 hn/a
Standby Mode85 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (1080p) No
Wide-angle lens 119 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 8 MP
Depth: 0.08 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/1.6f/2.0
Focal length23 mmn/a
SensorSony LYT-818n/a
Sensor size1/1.28n/a
Pixel size1.22 μmn/a
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Telephoto
Matrix200 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.7n/a
Focal length85 mmn/a
SensorSamsung ISOCELL HP9n/a
Sensor size1/1.4n/a
Pixel size0.56 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.0n/a
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN1n/a
Sensor size1/2.76n/a
Pixel size0.64 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 2592x1944 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 20 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung S5KKD1 CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.42 n/a
Pixel size 0.64 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHzGSM B2, B3, B5, B8
3G BandsWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8WCDMA B1, B5, B8
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66)LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28)
LTE categoryn/a4
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos No No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Vivo X200 Pro
n/a
Xiaomi Redmi A3
78.8 dB

Other

Class Flagship Budget
Announced October, 2024 yr February, 2024 yr
Release Date October, 2024 yr February, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 847 80
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 90 W Yes 10 W

Note

Vivo X200 Pro:

The black model is thinner (8.2) and lighter (223g).

Xiaomi Redmi A3:

The smartphone in green color is 7 grams lighter than the others.

* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below